I see that Arizona Governor Jan Brewer is under fire again, and I can understand why.  It is possible that “the majority of illegal trespassers” entering Arizona “are bringing drugs in,” but I am skeptical about her comment.  Certainly the majority of illegal immigrants (at least those from Mexico) enter the United States out of desperation–and this can be an incentive for drug smuggling.  However, from what I’ve seen and experienced (and there are numerous Mexicans here in Pensacola, Florida–some of whom may be here illegally), most of them come to work.  And they’re very hard workers–which is something I cannot say, at all, about alot of natural-born American citizens here.  

More to the point, however, I have actually examined the controversial Arizona law (Senate Bill 1070).   And I’ve concluded that it is (at least in part) in opposition to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which reads:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

There is certainly a problem with illegal immigration in this country–and desperate measures may need to be taken.  But I believe the new Arizona law is too desperate.  It is what I would call a gateway-law, opening a gate for law-enforcement officers to search and seize any persons in Arizona (regardless of ethnicity or race)–based entirely upon preconceived ideas.  In other words, if this law were enacted in Florida, and I were walking along my street, a law-enforcement officer could stop me (simply because I didn’t look right, to him/her), search me–and arrest me, if I didn’t happen to be carrying my ID.

Therefore, unless I misinterpret it, this Arizona law allows for unreasonable searches and seizures, which is in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment–and is thus unconstitutional.


  1. 1 morethananelectrician June 26, 2010 at 10:13 pm

    I can see your point, but I am pretty sure the scope of the law would be that during the normal course of police action like a speeding traffic stop or the investigation of a crime…THEN a request for identification can be made.

    I might have it wrong…but I think stopping someone and requesting their papers is wrong…but that isn’t really what this is about…

  2. 2 solosocial January 2, 2011 at 7:01 am

    You have it right, actually–that is normal police procedure. But the Arizona immigration law, in my opinion, enables police officers to skip the normal procedure.

    However, I’ve thought alot about this, in the past several months–and have concluded that the best solution would be the deployment of American military personnel to guard the U.S./Mexico border (and the U.S./Canada border, if necessary). After all, this is the purpose of any country’s military–to defend its own borders, not those of other nations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: