WHAT OUR PRESS IS NOT TELLING US

Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom…of the press…

And, perhaps unfortunately, it cannot.

Because a free press is an essential part of the balance of power in the United States (and in any other country, for that matter).  It is the watchdog that keeps the government in line.

But our press has become more powerful than our government.  Even the course of presidential elections is now dangerously influenced by the American press, which conducts polls that practically determine who will be president.

There is no balance of power anymore, regarding the American press.  Freedom of the press is now the most abused freedom in our Bill of Rights.

The American press has been criticized for being biased, perhaps since it was established.  And it has been criticized for being biased toward the political left–with good reason–for decades.  So this is nothing new.

What is new is that the American press is now an instigator, above everything else.  It has become completely irresponsible in its actions–literally inciting hatred, discord, rioting, and even murder.

More like an attack dog than a watchdog.

Sometimes the motive for the American press, in its new role of instigator, is political.  But more often it is financial.  The American press will do anything for money.

Lately, the American press has been using the “race card” with abandon–inserting the issue of race into every single event, even when it has nothing to do with race.  It is instigating racial discord.  Specifically, it is inciting hatred toward White Americans–especially White law enforcement officers–while simultaneously pretending to champion the rights of Black Americans.

During the 1950’s and 1960’s, the American press truly did champion the rights of Black Americans.

But now the American press just pretends to champion the rights of Black Americans, when it is really just attempting to use Black Americans for its own diabolical purposes.

The American press is no longer the watchdog, but the instigator.  And it doesn’t care how many Americans’ lives are destroyed, how many American lives are lost, in its quest for the “Almighty Dollar”.

Yet Congress can make no law abridging the freedom of the press–our government cannot regulate our press.

So it is up to us.

We, the people of the United States, must be the collective watchdog that keeps our press in line.  We are the only ones who can do it.  And we have a far more difficult task, as the watchdog of the press, than any government could ever have.

How do we get our press in line?

The only way to solve any problem is to first recognize the problem.

The only way we can solve this problem of abuse of freedom of the press is to first recognize that the American press is no longer serving us–it is serving only itself.

Everything we read, watch, or listen to–every potential Trojan horse the American press sends us–we must read, watch, or listen to, with skepticism.  We must consider the true intentions behind every single bit of “information” our press gives us. And instead of just accepting whatever our press tells us–we should ask ourselves what our press is not telling us.

2 Responses to “WHAT OUR PRESS IS NOT TELLING US”


  1. 1 duncanr October 29, 2015 at 3:43 pm

    “And it has been criticized for being biased toward the political left”

    here in the UK, the press is generally seen as biased towards the political right 😆 – especially, those newspapers owned by Australian born news magnate Rupert Murdoch

    but essentially we have the same problem re balance of power – more and more it seems, politicians are abandoning principles and beliefs and, instead, adopting policies designed to please Murdoch’s press for fear that, if they do not do so, the press will launch a negative campaign against them, which will threaten their ability to hang on to/gain power

    • 2 solosocial October 29, 2015 at 5:48 pm

      Thank you for that insight, Duncan.

      Yes, I’ve heard a lot of criticism of Rupert Murdoch–not from the American press, of course–but from other U.S. citizens. And it seems that this criticism of him is quite valid.

      And what you write is applicable to the United States, as well–in fact, is applicable to countries all over the world: “…politicians are abandoning principles and beliefs and, instead, adopting policies designed to please [the] press for fear that, if they do not do so, the press will launch a negative campaign against them, which will threaten their ability to hang on to/gain power.”

      In this country, the Republican Party gets most of its support from American corporations (most of which, because of their outsourcing of jobs–especially to Communist China–are American in name only)–while the Democratic Party gets most of its support from the American press (almost all of which is owned and controlled by Democrats). Yet–just as Democratic candidates can get support from American corporations if they pay them enough money–Republican candidates can get support from the American press, if they pay it enough money.

      Such was the case with the Republican candidate for Governor of the State of Florida, in 2010, for example. I didn’t know this candidate, Rick Scott, any more than I knew his Democratic opponent, Alex Sink. But I knew something was suspicious about Rick Scott from the beginning–he received almost all the air time on television for his campaign ads. This was illegal–the electronic media was bound by stricter FCC rules than the print media–television had to give equal time to both (or all) candidates. Yet television stations–especially WEAR (Pensacola’s primary station)–aired almost no ads for Alex Sink, and a plethora of ads for Rick Scott. So I knew, from the beginning, that this extremely wealthy CEO (of an HMO, if I’m not mistaken) had bought out the electronic media in Florida–had literally paid the television stations to violate FCC rules. And these television stations–owned by media corporations owned, in turn, by Democrats–had compromised even their Democratic Party leanings for Rick Scott’s money. So I voted for Rick Scott’s Democratic opponent, Alex Sink–convinced (almost with absolute certainty) that Rick Scott would have run for Florida Governor as a Democrat, if it would have been in his favor. This son of a bitch didn’t care about the Republican Party any more than the Democratic Party–he just wanted to be Governor of Florida. And Governor Rick Scott has proven me right–he has been grabbing money from law enforcement agencies, mental health providers, and numerous other representatives of the interests of Florida residents since he took office. He is a monster.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Categories


%d bloggers like this: